• SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    What happened is that they banned a specific piece of criticism. Where did you get “all criticism” from? The actual issue is still worth complaining about.

      • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        They are not allowing that criticism to be reposted:

        After deleting the original statement, we promptly asked about submitting the post for approval through the proper channels so that it could be reposted. At this point, ODP staff informed us that a meeting with Acton was on the table. After thorough discussion, caucus leadership determined this offer aligned with our goal to bring our message directly to her.

          • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            The quote I shared. I’ll try with more emphasis:

            After deleting the original statement, we promptly asked about submitting the post for approval through the proper channels so that it could be reposted. At this point, ODP staff informed us that a meeting with Acton was on the table. After thorough discussion, caucus leadership determined this offer aligned with our goal to bring our message directly to her.

            The meeting with Acton herself is offered and determined to be the best course of action. No mention of resubmitting the post, even though that is what they explicitly asked about.

            • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              So you’re just inferring that they denied the repost, but it’s not actually cited anywhere. Got it.

                • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Good journalism, I guess? Why are you fighting so hard to defend a deliberately misleading headline…?

                  • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Because it’s accurate, not misleading. They banned that criticism, they are taking an anti-trans stance.

                    Trans rights are human rights. Are you a bot? I can’t imagine why else you don’t care about your own rights.