I have a VPS that I secure as much as possible since the IP is public, but does a wireguard-access-only homelab warrant the same efforts? Those with homelabs like this, what do you do?

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If it’s just wireguard on a nonstandard port, then you are pretty much done. It’s UDP and won’t reply to incorrectly signed packets so it’s essentially invisible.

      • 0x0@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It is going to make fingerprinting more annoying while evading default port scans. That isnt nothing but you do you boo

        • sandwichsaregood@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I agree that there is some value to obscurity generally, but Wireguard already evades port scans and fingerprinting. Unless a packet is signed with a known key, it gives no response to traffic, so scanners and fingerprinters see a closed port. You ISP can identify WG traffic while you are connected by inspecting your traffic, but random scanners won’t see anything. Look on shodan, you won’t see Wireguard.