• Logi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I quoted the article. I’d love to see some evidence that it was wrong. That it was Martin’s predecessor who commissioned the e:report, or, at the very least, that this wasn’t “a friend of his”.

    Edit: if the article got those facts wrong, that sounds a lot like libel.