I might not completely follow.

there is no compromising with an unmoveable apparatus?

There is certainly a tonne of inertia that is… anti human.

Compromise is good and healthy, and best case you get the best of opposing views. Not sure I prefer a system where half the population gets smashed into misery.

I do get the frustration at compromising with… people with bad ideas. But they get a say as well. That’s democracy.

Edit: maybe you are referring to two party system. Which yeah isn’t great. But with multi party they still need to make deals and compromises, just at a different layer, still better though

Genuinely curious, why can’t browsers add some (non meaningful to users) jitter to values used in fingerprints such that fingerprints become random for a single user?

I’m reading that as two different metrics.

It’s more cost effective - saving a trillion dollars a year

It’s more medically effective - saving 100k lives a year.

You don’t divide one by the other, debt isn’t related.