Bold of you to assume that just because something is logicaly obvious that many people wont make illusions about it 😉

PSA lemmy is not safe from this.

Til about this specific absolute WTF

Thanks for the information.

I swear this exact story from this exact victim has been out for years. Down to the refusing to wear a condom and trowing money to “get a fucking abortion”

Obviously we should continue to repeat it but what changed since then? Why is the news only reporting on it now?

This is not a bomshell but a gaping crator of a bombshell that fell years ago.

Proof that you know one that does?

Apparently you’re right that MV3 only restricts extensions, not native blockers. I stand corrected on that part.

However, uBO on MV2 still has features that no known native ad blocker on a Chromium-based browser offers.

The closest match I could find is Brave Shields, but it still lags behind on per-site control, mainly because it has no dynamic filtering matrix, and it has no logger comparable to uBO’s. That most of the list i already mentioned multiple times.

To date, nothing matches or beats Firefox + uBO, so the original point still stands. The burden of proof that shows the contrary is on you for that.

I am going to do my best to explain the technical side in simple terms.

Chromium browsers use something called manifest V3.

V3 is a google designed “upgrade” to manifest V2 and it blocks certain advanced features provided by comprehensive adblocker like Ubo.

Wether an adblock is native or an extension does nothing to circumvent the native limitations of V3 that exists on all chromium browsers. If you have proof such hack exists that would actually be a technews worthy event.

The only (mainstream) browser that still supports V2 is firefox. Which is therefor the only browser that allows all the features of the full ublock origin. Firefox has no inbuild adblocker to compare to a chromium one.

I can believe that the features that work on V3 encompass your personal needs and that of many other people. But they are literaly not the same.

Some examples of features included in comprehensive v2 adblockers that are limited on v3 are:

(Not a full list)

• per site dynamic filtering
• per site disabling of javascript
• more detailed logger
• filters relying on runtime logic
• more comprehensive element picker

I (and the Ubo developers) would be happy to see any proof that shows otherwise.

This seems to be a bit of a miscommunication. But an extension is not native. And all versions of Ubo are extensions, something else doesnt exist.

You can define native a few different ways in english language so i get how it might be confusing if its not your first, but its similar to how a mod for a game is not native to the game.

When you mentioned “native adblock in chromium” That does exists and it requires no extension. But they are never as fully featured as the full Ubo extension which only works on firefox. Which is what this comparison is about.

I hope that helps.

Not the person you replied to but copied directly from https://ublockorigin.com/

Lite vs. full uBlock Origin

Choose Lite when…

• You use current Chrome or Safari.
• You want filtering modes with relatively little setup.
• Its browser-supported filters cover the sites you visit.

Choose full uBO when…

• You use Firefox on desktop or Android.
• You need dynamic filtering, the request logger, or advanced per-site controls.
• You rely on filter syntax that Lite cannot support.

Removed by mod

Your comment is the reason i engange. Things are rarely obvious at first.

Its the pre election timing.

Bertlewirth does not appear as a troll/propaganda to me. But i can understand that fonix may have confused them with being such because in many peoples experience there is a huge movement of democrat bashing right before an election that stops just after it. Pretty much the opposite of what it should be.

The whatabout facism-lite when we should idealy do everything to stop the facism-hard is one of the reasons many progressives are jumpy right now.

I’ve literally never seen anyone on the threadiverse suggest that we shouldn’t hold them accountable, or that they are “our team” for that matter.

As i said before. My suggestions is to make it clear that a vote =\= support by large anti fascist protestation the second they get elected.

Maybe you are just lucky but most likely its my own fault for enganging to much with these people. They are rarely explicit about it in the first comment.

In my experience a very large amount of lemmy users support an idea that you should not vote for the democrats because afterwards complatency is too easy while more of Trump may unlock a civil war revolution.

I highly disagree with it and i dont think it will work out that way. I rather fight facist-lite then cant-wait-for-an-excuse-to-bomb-“woke”-cities-facism but i do understand the logic those “users” apply.

The real question is, are those users actually real people voicing their personal opinions or are they trolls/bots. Its not a good sign how increasingly vocal they are right in front of a US election and suddenly silent afterwards. Complacent much?

My suggestion is to vote lesser evil and then the moment they win a No-kings protest, continueing to grill the entire office to make it clear their polical win comes with 0 support from the people.

I like the concept but i am skeptical to how much thought went into it.

It delends a lot about the particular neurological developmentd, flavors, genetics that are unique to each person.

The big “mystery” for me is what range is considered “the normal” range.

TIL Neurotypicals are able to remember how many weeks ago something occured.

I got banned from saying not all that is called ai is bad by giving video game npcs from the last decades as an example.

I thought it was just llms that they where against but nope. I imagine Alan Turing spinning in his grave.

Does the signal bot need its own phone number?