





We’ve been deep in those woods for years.


Really nicely navigated. It borders on impossible to agree with anybody across the board. There are things about President Obama that I didn’t like, but when I hear him speak, at least he is being thoughtful. He held the power with gravitas. He understood that he worked for the people and that the press worked for the people. I’d love to see leadership swing back in that direction worldwide.


I’m guessing they believe it meets the OSI definition of open source. Essentially that the code is licensed for redistribution.
Does this have tons of meaningless boilerplate and hard to follow call chains? I have read part of the source, and what I’ve seen looks pretty well organized, but if that is how you think the current models write code, you’ve missed many months.
I have tinkered with Orion. It has a lot of promise, but it is still a bit buggy. I’m all Firefox since before it was Firefox, but I respect your assessment. I’m also looking forward to Ladybird, even though it also has its fair share of controversy.
Recent Firefox has been really good to me. Vertical tabs and new design are excellent; though I don’t seem to be with the crowd in that.
One small feedback that is meant less as a correction and more in case people are curious. Chromium isn’t an engine, it is an open source browser. The Gecko / WebKit equivalent here is Blink.


I don’t know exactly what you’re after since project management is such a broad topic, but I can just say how I do this.
I keep 2 obsidian vaults: 1 personal and 1 professional. Among hundreds of other notes and topics I keep a project note per project (some personal some professional), keyed by project directory. Each keeps a running history of what is happening with each project. Then my daily journal links to the projects I’m working on with short notes about what is happening.
This is an aside, but obsidian.nvim is a superb way to interact with these notes.
If you’re looking for kanban and such, that’s a completely different approach, but I find after decades of sucking at keeping track, this has finally fit nicely with how I approach projects.


That first chart is hilarious. They think we have become to soft but secretly believe themselves to be the cause of that softness and in need of the boosters.


That’s actually really well put and a great argument that cuts through all this bullshit.


Even if all or any of that were true, there is no excuse for the genocide.
Genocide bad. Simple.


How did you get that? Precisely the opposite. I’m saying lesser of two evils doesn’t fly when the people one “holds their nose” to vote for support a genocidal terrorist state.


No shit. One can’t take the “lesser of two evils” approach by accepting the greatest of all evils.


And I agree completely. But I think many assign the blame primarily to a weak opposition, which while true gives a tacit pass to the real evil driving the ship aground.


Definitely some responsibility there, but I’m pretty sure it is mostly due to all the fascists.
Ooh! This release looks excellent.
Headline was a bit confusing. How does destroy improve the economy? Ads


Their insatiable desire for the taste of boots and cock.


Depends what you mean by “fine”. Tor will still guarantee anonymity through the three-hop model, and no they cannot see the contents of your traffic. But it really depends on your risk tolerance. The real problem in this scenario is traffic analysis.
I’m not sure how the video stream packets look in that scenario but they may still be able to infer through protocol or density that some video is streaming and block that. Again, without knowing what is in the stream.
But you have to be cautious about other attackers in the network targeting your device. Those risks can circumvent all sorts of safety you might think you have.


New evidence rarely changes sentiment in a cult.


sourcehut hosts it free and makes publishing dead simple. You just push a tarball, and Bob’s your mother’s brother.