Would you rob a bank too, if they asked you to? Because that’s what you’ll have done if your biometrical data gets sold into the wrong hands.

Why would you be so stupid to scan your face?

Fuck all.

So even if he croaks tomorrow and the couch fucker is in there nothing’s going to change.

Too many people are oblivious to this obvious assessment. :/ You’re one of very few I see who share that opinion. The think if the orange pedo croaks the world will miraculously be cured. Spoiler: it won’t.

I am not a corporation, and I don’t hate copyleft in general, just redundant and abundant legalese like in this one.

What a shitty choice of a license. Typical EU legal garbage full of duplications and “lawyers” thinking “more is better”.

Also:

The provisions of this Licence can be accepted by clicking on an icon ‘I agree’ placed under the bottom of a window displaying the text of this Licence or by affirming consent in any other similar way, in accordance with the rules of applicable law. Clicking on that icon indicates your clear and irrevocable acceptance of this Licence and all of its terms and conditions.

Lol, these morons. Of course the EU pencil pushers would hyperfixate on “clicking a button”.

/a European

I have had to debug code of “software devs with more than 10 years of experience” often enough to know experience does not equal skill. If you think slop generators are helping you, while you by violating the licenses of all developers whose code went into the training data, then you apparently did not invest those 10 years well.

LLMs are a subset of AI though.

Obviously, but all machine learning systems that I am aware of - and definitely the generative ones - lack the “I” in AI in their core processing. I won’t dispute that there’s actual deterministic algorithms implemented before and after the core processing, to handle grammar rules etc. But there’s a huge danger in accepting the term “AI” for the slop machines of today. Gullible people will mistake linguistically sophisticated output for actual understanding, and trust the output to be correct. Less gullible people have the obligation (imo) to set that record straight every time the topic comes up. Because gullible people vote, too - and they will otherwise be fine with slop machines controlling critical infrastructure the malfunction of which may be lethal.

And OP made the outrageous claim that reviewing and correcting LLM output would be less effort than “also writing it”. Even if LLMs did not, as they do, tend to generate a lot of garbage code to throw at tiny problems, and even if they did not MASS VIOLATE LICENSES AND COPYRIGHTS (yes, that makes me angry), the time spent on developing an all but trivial algorithm is a constant back and forth between writing it, reviewing it and tuning it. The actual writing of code is negligible compared to the amount of time a serious developer has to spend thinking about what a line of code does, and what it does not do.

The only people that “benefit” from LLM generated code are people who would otherwise not be able to piece together a stable bit of software beyond a “Hello World”, and now they break out of their sandboxes and waste the time of actual developers with their slop pull requests. One could almost assume this was an intended side effect by big corporations to kill the trust and efficiency in open source projects.

AI will generate code that is mostly correct, the human time cost of (properly) reviewig this code and correcting it is generally less than also writing it

Just calling LLMs “AI”, you disqualified yourself from being able to assess what proper programming is about.

That said, your statement is also objectively false in all other aspects.

Github is microslop, a company who supports a fascist regime. So no, worst choice.

Divided states of america’s political caste being pieces of shit worldwide causing devastating harm to California wine industry.

ftfy.