gotcha ! Thanks

I see you want to sink me under a lot of points, allow me to do the same:

1. You’d have to be really naive to think that a project contains four AGENTS.md files and pretend AI wasn’t used
2. .editorconfig is, at it says, a config for editors. You can pretty much infer that an editor was used, but you can’t say which. Just like an AGENTS.md indicates an AI was used, or is expected to be used, but you can’t know which one
3. I said this project is AI-oriented, which the phrase you cite conforts.
4. No one here is saying that Claude coded it. I raised the point because I assume AI was used, and this is what the policy talks about
5. “Your promotional post” talks about the post, not the project
6. “If you are promoting a project” talks about you promoting the project, meaning the post, not the project
7. This is /c/selfhosted on lemmy.world. Other communities have other rules. The post you point to is made in another community, it’s irrelevant here.
8. This is /c/selfhosted on lemmy.world. I’m asking the question in the community. Note that my instance isn’t lemmy.world.
9. The discussion isn’t stickied nor linked from the rules. But it does exist

Shall we next audit every IDE autocomplete suggestion the dev ever accepted, look at their CV, review their commit history and inspect what they ate for lunch?

Is it possible to discuss as adults or do you have to resort to absurd arguments ?

I assume that the tags don’t exist but to convey information. The information is relevant whether the author of the post is the author of the project or not, that’s why I asked for it.

If you want my opinion on something that, as you said, as already be decided: if it’s too complicated to know whether AI was used, then flag it as AIP. There will be issues, just like any decision, but it will be a different set of issues. But are you really interested in my opinion or do you just want to pretend differing opinions are absurd ?

Or can we just share cool things we find and let end users make up their own minds?

That wouldn’t be in the spirit of disclosure, the one that was accepted by the community and for which you pinged a moderator now would it

What would I report it for ? It’s perfectly fine for the author to modify the title if it is needed no ?

Just like the discussion last time on this - every user will not be able to be a forensically review.

I didn’t see it ! Sorry about that.

Just like the discussion last time on this - every user will not be able to be a forensically review.

AGENTS.md in a repository are used to guide development. The very file talks about using typescript; you don’t need typescript to use the app do you ?

So if you’d like to propose this

I was just asking for a precision, but that’s because I didn’t check archives enough

And I don’t see any option for how this could be realistically implemented.

I see at least one: if the project doesn’t have a clear no-ai policy, then assume it is AIP. But that’s not my proposition at the moment.

My personal recommendation is going through https://slopscan.ava.pet/ . It’s a simple analyzer, surfaces files and commits. It’s of course not perfect.

a project that used AI in development in any capacity. Disclosure is required for how it was used.

The number one sign, there is an AGENTS.md file: https://github.com/Zavy86/WikiDocs/blob/main/AGENTS.md

(There are actually 4, depending on the part the user works on)

The readme contains “ready for use with the LLM tools you choose” which is the reason I said “AI-oriented”

it’s not my project

But you’re doing the promotion of it, and I suspect rules need to be clarified here. The most important to me was to flag that AI might have been used here, and it’s not clear, whoever the author is.

EDIT: asked the question here: https://lemmy.world/post/52376145

This project is AI oriented, I think you should tag it with [AIP]

Yeah I’m using motd as well and it’s the best one, I only wish it wasn’t made with AI…

Quick question after you found happiness using IRC: was xmpp not enough ? I’m genuinely curious in case I need something like this

This list https://noai.starlightnet.work/list.html has a long list of projects explicitly rejecting AI and there are some in there I would place in the “big and mature” bucket

If you’re not going to have many editors, don’t hesitate to look at https://feather.wiki/ . It’s a single-file wiki with everything embedded, so to modify it you actually do your changes then get the new index.html that you can push back to the hosting place. No server-side process, no scaling issues, SEO-friendly, portable, backupable, etc…

This means your pages would retain the classic wiki change log, so that it can all be generated from a Git repo that’s small enough to keep on a floppy disk.

That already exists: https://ikiwiki.info/ . It is by default a bit more raw than dokuwiki but does the same thing in the end.

fossil is made by actual engineers, maybe we should follow that path

When capitalism can’t find a new way to grow and is challenged by dominees, it funds fascism as an investment towards to guarantee their dominance

I have a vps I use for other stuff, and put syncthing on it. My files are replicated between it, my computer and my phone. On the vps I activated the setting to store old versions

For photos I use hetzner’s storage share, a nextcloud offering. Photos are browsable with nextcloud’s “memories” app, really useful.

I don’t really believe in “backups”, ie a full copy of the content in another format that is unusable unless you run it through a special restoring process. If the files are being copied, why not make it useful ? Syncthing makes it so all environments are equally usable, and the versioning prevents mistakes. There is no restore phase: the files are already usable.

I really think we need to move our thinking away from the one-machine-with-copies mindset, and architecture our usages around multiple-machines-by-default. If the goal of backups is resiliency, a syncthing clusters achieves that.

garage is a software project made for communal home hosting. Tech literates will talk about its S3 API but that’s the least interesting part: the most interesting is that it has been purposely built to be hosted on (actual) commodity hardware like second-hand nucs, running on flaky home power and internet and linked together through usual isps. Nodes may come up and down but the cluster withstands all of that.

Garage would be a pretty nice project to run a solar-powered mini-cluster. If sufficiently far from each other, you could even run without polluting batteries !

https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/

Go for deltachat or arcanechat, both are compatible. Actually floss, decentralized, secure, self-hostable (but you don’t need to), doesn’t need phone numbers or id or whatevs