So, your argument is merely that the point he blogs about does not matter?
No
Or do you somehow not want people to discuss it?
No
I wrote that I don’t want to invalidate his points. I think they are valid.
All that our efforts did
That statement is just too strong.
I do not see how that adresses his core argument
It doesn’t, as I wrote in my first sentence. Free software alone is just nice enough that it is more than a little gain.
Not to invalidate his points but:
We won the debate, and gained little for users or developers. All that our efforts did was to make it easier for big corporations build things more cheaply and for billionaires to become trillionaires.
We have free software. We have Linux. We have Graphene OS.
Everybody can build whatever they want. That’s a huge win.
The algorithm is in Beijing.
It runs in Beijing or it is developed in Beijing?
The US must have the power to manage block lists and weights and if they see undesired election influence they will pull the plug.
Different company?
Motorola was split into two independent public companies: Motorola Solutions (its legal successor) and Motorola Mobility (spun off), on January 4, 2011
At least it would be named after a colored person.
The Fediverse has 1.2 million monthly users.
If Truth Social would open up, would instances be willing to federate?
It matches that the US are supposedly preparing a limited ground invasion.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/pakistani-officials-believe-us-could-123417896.html
How, especially if you don’t know that they are criminals?
But you don’t know what they plan. The organised criminals do it regularly.
People can still meet offline.
After that nobody would be able to hide anything
How would you enforce that?
The CIA, not navy intelligence?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(network)