Peacepath

Yes, transphobia can be used against anyone, even against cis gender transphobes!

There is no way to both prove one is not a trans and keep their dignity. And even sacrifying their dignity, it could still be called fake, AI-forged, or make their opponent claim that they are a closeted egg trans.

Which makes that cis gender transphobes should take position against transphobia.

(And even if that is not against her, and I recognize trans women are women, I really think JKR is a trans woman ^^)

Who ever wins, trans will only have rights in the US if they keep fight for it. So the question isn’t who make the best promises before the vote, but who is the most likely to accept to negociate after.

I do not think a ban would be efficient. It would just force those who use AI to dissimulate it. I see it a bit as drug use, banning hasn’t solved the problem ; and the countries who handled it the best were those regulating the use.

So I think we should look for a good regulation. It is more complicated to set up, but it has a chance to work.

In my mind, it should allow some projects to identify as not using any AI, and request that each project define what is their use of AI. Ideally, we could know this without opening the project (maybe thanks to a badge).

Also, shaming the use of AI only has the same aim as banning it: forcing it to grow hiden and out of control.

Excuse my curiosity, put as a non-american I don’t understand one thing: since you have only two candidates at elections, you do not vote for a candidate but against their opponent, right?

It has been a time, not that long ago, when becoming american was wished by many. At that time, being resident of a territory absorbed by the USA would have been regarded as a chance by a large part of those living it, and jealoused by many near by territories.

The negative reactions to Trump’s dreams of expension are the clear mark of the failure of his politics.

Thanks, it makes it more clear…

Excuse me to be naive, but since democrats voted against slavery abrogation, how can it be seen as anything else than a far-right party?

Republican are clearly far-rightists too, ok… but still…

It sounds to me as a failure for the education system. They probably didn’t deserve to die of believing in lies they could have rejected if they had received a good education in terms of critical thinking…

Companies use windows at work, because it was used in school. Rather than adapt employees to Linux, better pay for windows (many go for very old and dangerous versions to spare money, and that threaten economy, but it is cheaper).

If workers know Linux, companies would make them work on Linux, rather than pay windows and adapt workers to windows.

As long as Linux is more likely to prevent massive hacks of companies’datas, the gouvernment should push for Linux at school in order to push companies toward their own safety…