

Lmfao. Swing voters didn’t give two shits about Democracy.
They voted in Trump after impeachment and they repeatedly vote Republican after citizens United.
Give your head a shake bud, this win was entirely about cost of living.


Lmfao. Swing voters didn’t give two shits about Democracy.
They voted in Trump after impeachment and they repeatedly vote Republican after citizens United.
Give your head a shake bud, this win was entirely about cost of living.


Oh yes, that worked so well last time.
Honestly, is this a sarcastic joke?


Good.
People on here arguing for impeachment are idiots given what happened last time.


deleted by creator
That article feels AI written.


:/
Come on now. My point is that the headline is needlessly divisive.
Do you really think that distinction changes that?


Also, the article headline is that ‘men wearing smart glasses on dates is a red flag’…
Regardless of the stats of who is being creepy currently, the headline is still wrong and needlessly gendered as anyone who wears them on a date is a red flag.


I have no stories of anyone abusing these glasses other than the small handful of anecdotes in the article that can fit on one hand.
And as the article points out, 7M of these glasses were sold, so 2-3 stories is not exactly statistically significant or relevant.
I can find you numerous stories of female stalkers and creeps using cellphones though, if that is would help.


I can think of countless cases of women sharing stuff on social media that they shouldn’t.
The point is that creeps wear creep glasses.
Just because the author is being needlessly divisive for clicks doesn’t mean you need to continue that chain.


Given that you’re operating on anecdotal evidence, the onus would be on you to prove that the effect is exclusively gender linked.
I quite frankly wouldn’t be surprised if men are more of a problem with them than women or non binary folk, but as-is the headline is needlessly and intentionally divisive,and does not support that conclusion. Hell, I would argue that the majority of what most people post on social media is creepy, men and women included. It’s weird to share non consensual images of people publicly, regardless of how insta rotted your brain is.
We should all always be trying to use people first language unless there’s a really specific reason not to, and in this case the point is that people being creepy wear creep glasses, there’s no reason to bring gender into it, the reader can draw their own conclusions based on what they know about creepy people.


This is horseshit that should be deleted. Some VC billionaire is funding a campaign to make everyone hate social security so they can privatize it.


My guess (and just a guess), is that you either a) crossed some overall file size limit… Not sure why that would make a difference but if initially you had 2GB of music and then you had 8GB, maybe it’s choking after the 4GB point or something.
Other thought is that one of the files you put on there is specifically choking it… Either something in the filename or the metadata etc is causing the running android auto software to fail midway through processing all the files and that causes some to not show up.
Try again, with just the original first working batch and make sure that works, then try adding half of the new batch to see if that works, if it does, add half the remainder, and so on and so forth til you find the problem file or limit.


They can already target children through existing means. This doesn’t change anything for bad actors.
Pedophiles aren’t being blocked from finding kids on Roblox because they don’t have an OS confirmation that the person checked a box saying they’re roughly a child, and legitimate companies can already do this through the numerous existing ways of determining user demographics.
Targeted advertising is not a problem that is solved by OS level security, it can only be solved through legislation targeting the actual harmful practice. A user spending any amount of time online will always leak enough data to figure out roughly who they are, especially with AI tooling that can do pattern recognition orders of magnitude more effectively than anything that came before.
OS level account setting is by far the simplest and least intrusive method of having some kind of age verification. Parents setup their kids account then the OS transmits the signal to the server. No IDs, no government involvement, no databases.


K, but you know that cancer itself starts from a single cell right?


K, keeps being scared of stuff you make up in your head and watch nothing ever happen.


No he’s not, because actual medical professionals don’t diagnose people at a distance.
The fact that he’s claiming to while claiming he’s a professional tells you that at least one of those two statements is false.


As an outside observer, it looks like either Obama could have, it looks like Sanders could have, it looks like Budigeg could, it looks like Mamdani could.
Run a real candidate against him with a coherent political view that’s not just a bunch of big D Democrat nonsense.


Good.
OS level age gating is the best possible solution. It means a parent can simply set an OS level account as a child’s and that’s it. No IDs, no verification process.


Who the fuck cares? Stop wasting your time with meaningless nonsense.
Play the game of politics and learn how to beat him, or stfu. This is just big-D Democrat nonsense. The world is not an ideal fairy tale, this does not matter one iota unless his base cares, which they very obviously don’t.
They impeached him