She’s always been a narcissistic shithead.
If you want a good laugh, read up on how the Texas GOP ran a campaign targeting her supporters so they would gas her up to run for Senate, because the Texas GOP knew even Ken Paxton could smoke her.
She’s the epitome of not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Clyburn has always been a gigantic piece of shit.
Same then as he is now.
SCOTUS has relatively recently ruled that a mail carrier can throw out mail of black residents, while delivering the mail of white residents, and not be held liable for any wrong doing.
Some of those states are 100% vote by mail.
Just so long as they don’t restrict any new AI data center construction that relies on the Colorado River.
I can live without food, but not without ChatGPT.
That 65% voted for President Trump.
deleted by creator
Going off statistics, the vast majority of these sailors, and their families, got exactly what they voted for.
I don’t want to hear from a single parent now, who didn’t also speak out after their precious whittle babies murdered 175 school-girls, or the countless other civilians the USN killed during its most recent warcrime speed.
If given the chance, the overwhelming majority of those sailors would happily vote for a third Trump term.
He is accused of having sexual intercourse with a 17-year-old girl when he was 18, according to Tyler Boebert’s arrest affidavit
I understand recording the act turns this into something serious, but I mean come on, it’s an 18-year-old and a 17-year-old, having sex.
Her and Collins only come out against something if they’re sure it’ll pass without their support.
That means at the time of her statement, the votes had already been whipped.
And lo and behold, by the time of my comment, it has been confirmed that Cassidy will support.
You keep misunderstanding me.
Iran is deploying the exact same anti-air defense strategies that were developed on the battlefield of Ukraine.
That is smart, they we’re not trying to not reinvent the wheel.
But it also means that the headline is misleading as it was not them who developed the strategy, or “figured” it out.
It’s just a bad headline, which I was calling attention to, but it’s not something I would normally devote multiple comments to, so this is my last one.
I read the article and wasn’t trivializing their accomplishment.
But that has nothing to do with the editorial choices of The Intercept and the misleading nature of that headline, which is what my comment was directed at.
It’s the exact same strategy that has been used by both Ukraine and Russia for years now.
The only difference is that instead of America providing Ukraine their ISR, conducting BDAs, etc., it’s China and/or Russia providing those intelligence services to the Iranians.
I understand the changing dynamics of war unleashed in Ukraine, I’m commenting on the subject of the article you posted.
The headline makes it sound like it was some mystery that had yet to be solved, or a problem that hadn’t already been figured out.
Defeating enemy air defense is not a state secret.
It just requires a technologically capable military with good ISR and healthly munition stockpiles.
Destroy radars, launch saturation attacks, and persistence.
Some specific weapons may have better, or worse, hit rates due to their technological capabilities, or limitations, but that’s not what the strategy ultimately relies on.
Sure, no other source, except for the video and hot mic recording of her saying exactly what’s being reported here.
Here’s another news source, which includes the actual recording.
But of course, we can all see that truth is not what you’re actually after here.
How dare you.
Now the ladybugs will never be seen again.
Yes, because they’re sick and tired of always coming in 2nd place.