GooeyGlob

It’s rule 8, if they don’t follow it, their post should be deleted. Personally, I feel like accounts should be outright banned for failing to disclose, because it’s not fair to put such overdue burden on the moderators to try to figure out whether something is AI generated if they’re not going to disclose.

Crom and bash are definitely gateway drugs to automation, hehe. Enjoy!

One thing is you should not make assumptions about the path in cron. If it’s in anywhere than /usr/bin, I would specify the path of the script/binary. Otherwise it looks great.

Removed by mod

Your hardware is actually more than capable. The stuttering in browsers is because Qubes no longer allows hardware acceleration. See https://doc.qubes-os.org/en/latest/user/troubleshooting/media-troubleshooting.html

The other big OOTB problem is the default private storage size (i.e. /home/user) for VMs is 2GB, which is insanely small for any sort of interactive use, and needs to be bumped up just to enable a web browser’s cache to reach a reasonable size. Let alone being able to store a useful amount of data to be stored in the VM.

I think when you get past these few things, it’s more smooth sailing.

Pointless additional rambling that can be ignored:

I also at first really liked what QubesOS offers in terms of VM templating, and being able to have multiple AppVM share the same base OS template as more or less immutable (i.e. on next AppVM boot, any changes you made to the system partition in the AppVM are completely reverted to the template’s copy). So one can run multiple AppVMs without wasteful duplication of a unique system partition for each VM. This does mean one must boot up the template VM every time new system packages are needed for the AppVMs based on that template, installing the software, shutting down the template VM, then restarting the AppVM.

Ultimately I ended up just creating a bunch of Standalone VMs, and installed different software into each, rather than trying to come up with an efficient, combined template that had all the software I needed for all my app VMs. Less secure, but just more practical.

Getting used to the clipboard manager is another thing that just takes time, but eventually you get it down. All these things are there for security and I understand why they are there, but it definitely has a huge learning curve.

You can definitely generate real downvotes! This looks like it fills up the entire Fediverse downvote Bingo card.

Same same, sucks as they seemed neutral but boy do they not seem to care about appearances.

Big Netbird fan, and they support a fully self hosted version.

Since you know Debian, Devuan is there to try it. Given how almost unavoidable systemd is nowadays I basically try all of Devuan, Artix, Void and the first one that works for the task at hand is the one I stick to :)

No, if you mean 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255, that is a /16 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.255 is a /24 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.7 is a /29

I was a little glib in my initial response. You really don’t want to start your definition in the middle of a subnet.

I would set it up so your first group of /29 would be 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.7

Second would be 192.168.0.8 - 192.168.0.15 (192.168.0.8/29)

Third would be 192.168.0.16 - 192.168.0.23 (192.168.0.16/29)

And so on.

The problem looks to be your subnet specification. /24 is 256 addresses. So for your 192.168.0.10/24 export, you’re exposing it to 0.10 and the following 255 IPs.

The closest thing to what you want to achieve would be a /29, which would expose it to the given IP and the following 7 IPs.

Well aside from the obvious giveaways in the presentation format of the README.md, and .gitignore, the very first question of its FAQ is:

“You use LLMs? 🤯”

Yes. Heavily. Claude and GLM-5.2 wrote a lot of this repo.