• 1 Post
  • 19 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 22nd, 2023

help-circle


  • I’ve used gpslogger for a very long time (Currently for Traccar and a daily gpx to gdrive, but have used it for other things over the years), and it’s possibly the most tweakable app of its type.

    Settings, Performance is the place to adjust for battery life.

    My settings are below, it’s a fair balance for what I want. Basic rule is - fewer fixes and sends, the less battery is used. using the GPS uses battery, so does sending data somewhere. Reducing that frequency and the battery will last longer.

    Log GPS locations - yes. Choose best accuracy in duration - yes Rest of toggles turned off.

    Logging interval: 15s Distance 3m Accuracy filter 40m Duration to match 20s Absolute time to fix, 20s


  • Dingaling@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.ml•Rich Hickey: 'AI' is Not a Tool
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Thanks for the tldr; As a semantic argument I agree with the first commenter in the article, it goes too far.

    Managers sometimes refer to their employees as tools, and they don’t fully control them either. Plenty of more cleanly defined tools (explosives, guns, chemicals) can have unintended consequences if used without proper controls, training or care.

    I used the term “AI is a tool” at a meeting yesterday, and I will again.

    (Minor grumble: Eww, Linkedin. Having visited the site again I know I’ll get a bunch more spam and targetted adverts for a few weeks)








  • Dingaling@lemmy.mltoOpen Source@lemmy.ml•Ban AI Slop?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    I had a report for AI slop today. 1m LOC in 3 months.

    I don’t understand this, is it human slop?

    Would love to hear your thoughts.

    AI is here and not going away. Almost every programmer I know, professionally and hobby, uses it to a greater or lesser extent.

    We have plenty of crap software in foss that was authored by people, always have, even when it was called public domain. I’ve certainly shared crap code going back over three decades and I don’t need a clanker to make it bad.

    Bad software gets rejected or unused because it’s not very good. Why can’t those same standards apply whoever or whatever created it?

    The only thing I think is important, is to be honest.





  • Dingaling@lemmy.mltoOpen Source@lemmy.ml•Open source vs proprietary software
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Absolutely - anything can have more than one objective. But when money is an objective, the one constant is that it changes what it affects. Sometimes better in some ways, sometimes worse.

    Sport is a good analogy here, I think. Amateur sport has little impact beyond those directly involved. Adding money increases exposure of those sports, better facilities, lots of scope for good - and yet big money sports are also very often mired in corruption and greed. (FIFA being a timely example) Those base human behaviours never go away.





  • Um, do you? I don’t seem to need to, never had except for major release updates and changing sources.

    Just now;

    root@backups:~# cat /etc/os-release
    PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie)"
    NAME="Debian GNU/Linux"
    VERSION_ID="13"
    VERSION="13 (trixie)"
    VERSION_CODENAME=trixie
    DEBIAN_VERSION_FULL=13.5
    

    Then “apt update” and “apt upgrade” followed by “reboot” and

    root@backups:~# cat /etc/os-release
    PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie)"
    NAME="Debian GNU/Linux"
    VERSION_ID="13"
    VERSION="13 (trixie)"
    VERSION_CODENAME=trixie
    DEBIAN_VERSION_FULL=13.6
    

    (My history)

     497  apt update
      498  cat /etc/os-release
      499  apt upgrade
      500  reboot
      501  uname -a
      502  cat /etc/os-release
      503  history