Does blood “take out the trash too”, i didnt realize it serves that dual function. Like I knew it transports oxygen and maybe nutrients vaguely…

Im curious if reclining is as bad, I very rarely (almost never actually “sit”, more of a divan guy

What does that actually do downstream or like what is the nexus to the physiologic conclusion of cancer or whatever its being linked to?

How does worse blood flow achieve or result in cancers or etc?

I mean like, what is it about standing or even light movement that is so distinct on a biological/cellula level?

The appeal to whats natural or kind of teleollogical doesnt address that, like is there an actual material theory about “this is your body on sitting…”

What is it about sitting that is always linked to this or that?

extremely concerning

Who are the fucking nonces electing her?

Enjoy the oil prices you voted for, O_hi_o

What is this?

libertarians hate government

Not when a fascist is in government

Always money for whatever they want

Its almost like Netanyahu is a fucker who basically engineered a false flag attack so he wouldnt have to go to jail for corruption and he could have an excuse to genocide

Him and Putin should be forced to fuck each other to death after being shaved completely bald

deleted by creator

NYPost fails my report card for being a FAILING, FASCISTIC, RAG of a JOKE buttwipe roll. SAD!

You’re acting like this is some kind of concession Newsom is making?

Its not. This is who he is and what he does, its completely consistent and predictable

deleted by creator

Umm, Talarico??

This shit should neither require nor allow such money. They can have all the free speech they want ranting on fox and stupid podcasts or radio shows, no more is necessary

Sinema’s lawyer, Steven Epstein

You cant make this shit up. Not that you should judge a person by their last name, but hilarious little coincidence here 🤣

No offense taken, I know very little about Linux currently so its all the same fine to me as a jumping off point or analogy to begin from.

Things can be incorrect or “inapt” yet still have value as a stepping stone to the discourse about whatever :)

I personally find it much easier to understand and learn things by being safely/comfortably wrong at many different points (especially at the beginning) and get corrected by a more knowledgable god samaritan. If you’re never or not often enough wrong (like memorizing things by rote or just accepting and memorizing what anybody says) or not hypothesizing you dont develop a connection to the domain

It was ridiculously difficult for me to get the letter and spirit of it to where it ended up for some reason.

We’re really digging into first principles here :D