No, they believe in shit. This particular ass wrote a fascist manifesto where he claimed that Germany and Japan were “neutered” after WW2.

They were stuck in traffic having attended an AIPAC linked organizations event.

Johnson is stepping down, and also will not be speaker come January

Impeachment is pardon proof via the constitution. The actual limits have never been tested, but someone with gumption could argue that the crimes one has been impeached over, cannot be pardoned at all.

The massive war chest that Jefferies controlled did in fact give him the power to choose the House and Senate leaders on the Democrat side.

That war chest is gone.

Jefferies is an AIPAC recipient. Kushner is Trump’s bribery guy. And Israel’s as well. Maybe Russia and the Saudies.

Point being, there’s only one reason to meet with Kushner, and that’s some form of bribery.

Well, it fails at number 1. Flat out.

And it also fails number 2.

All while introducing new failure conditions.

RCV is a bad system. We’re already doing a version of it more isn’t a fix, it’s just more complexity to an already broken system.

The actual way to get the very things you want are with Cardinal voting systems like STAR.

Let’s look at that track record.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-negative_responsiveness#Specific_examples

Three massive, and provable failures that flipped an election due to a spoiler candidate. The very thing RCV claims to prevent.

There’s a reason why Condorcet only used his version of RCV as an example of a system that could not reliably produce the pairwise winner.

Then about 50 years later an Englishman reinvents the system but for multiple winner elections. Then later another Englishman strips out the multi-winner part and we’re back to the same system described in Condorcet’s 1785 Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix.

Translated that’s Essay on the Application of Analysis to the Probability of Majority Decisions.

I say very slight because of the many, many, glaring flaws of the system.

The fact that it does not eliminate the spoiler effect is a major one.

All it does is kick the spoiler effect down the road a bit. It eliminates the also ran candidates. As soon as a third party candidate actually becomes halfway viable, the spoiler effect kicks in harder than ever and skews the election the other way.

And FairVote (the assholes who keep pushing a broken system) know this.

The simplest argument against RCV is thus, the current US primary system followed by a General election functions nearly identically to a version of RCV capped at two rounds.

Blue Dogs tend to vote with the pack if they can’t be the single special snowflake. (i.e. the checks don’t clear as well when they have to be split five ways)

Ranked Choice is a slight improvement over our current system, but it was first invented in 1785 and has some inherent flaws. Flaws that can be exploited by bad actors to subvert elections.

May I suggest STAR. It was designed in 2014, and makes it much harder to subvert an election.

Fun fact, a simple majority can remove the filibuster. The House never had one, and the senate only adopted it as an internal rule.

Joel Kaplan served in the Whitehouse and then was instantly hired by Zuckerberg to “engender ties to conservatives” right as Obama took office.

Kaplan is one of the people who drove 2020, by exempting right wing disinfo sites from Facebook’s news truthfulness standards, and by putting his thumb on the scales of the algorithm to promote right-wing content.

Let me introduce you to 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

Seems pretty reasonable, it’s a law that was passed just after the civil war, meant to give recently freed slaves the ability to sue over the continued efforts of the southern racists to maintain white nationalism.

Sadly this article tells you the current state of the law.

https://www.techdirt.com/2018/09/05/appeals-court-judge-qualified-immunity-is-rigged-game-government-almost-always-wins/

Not very high. But it is likely a specially tuned version of grok.

Harp was an anchor at newsmax or oan. One of the two.

She was creepy about her trump worship while on air, and apparently has gotten worse since.

She controls trumps social media, except for trumps use of grok, which is his other main advisor.

I’ve not heard about any foreign government ties, but it wouldn’t surprise me.

But harp does seem to be the true believer type. Obsessive even.

Evidence based on immigration filings from decades ago…

It doesn’t matter what judge they found, it’s still a fishing expedition that should have never been allowed.

Don’t play team sports with people’s lives in service of fascism.

Get the buzz going now to force the issue when they can, because you can’t move the overton window without speaking out about it.

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-grok-2677974491/

https://truthout.org/articles/report-trump-used-grok-to-help-talk-him-into-illegal-invasion-of-venezuela/

There are a few more stories like this, but those two tell most of it.

He closed down Trump Model Management in early 2017, likely because of the open child trafficking, and lost his connection to MC2 Modeling when Epstein was arrested. But he still has Paolo Zampolli, who to the best of my searching, still has deep ties to ID Model management.

But who are we kidding, Trump still has ties to a lot of creeps. Funny that.