Definitely need to remove them.

You can’t even see that everyone is dismissing you from how absurd you sound?

I pity you.

I’m not even going to reply to that, because it is so absurdly nonsensical. But congratulations to you, you managed to sound more crazy than the “AI” cult that has been infesting lemmy lately.

But capitalism isn’t a problem

The famous “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” then.

Fun fact, it’s easier to treat the underlying cause if you also ease the symptoms. And when the cause is not immediately treatable, refusing to soothe the symptoms is the height of idiocy.

Ah, you must be part of the “keep politics out of computer science” crowd then.

LLMs are political, no matter how they are used. Their existence has an effect, and pretending that it is only about what usage is made of them is just another bad faith argument.

You’re just trying to shift things so that you can delude yourself into thinking that you can enjoy your comfortable use of LLMs, while still pretending to oppose capitalism and whatnot.

Selective morals are not morals.

Because people’s love of cults of personality is endless.

Add on top of that the “AI” cult that saw this as an amazing recruitment opportunity, and you get a nice combo.

That’s basically the computer science equivalent of having a famous actor advertise a sect.

It’s like saying that people criticizing racism are stupid to think that racism will magically disappear if they talk about it enough.

You come to talk about your immoral crap, I’ll tell you to fuck off. Doesn’t matter if you don’t, it doesn’t matter if it doesn’t make LLMs disappear, I’m not going to just accept your garbage just because the world is drowning in it.

It’s called having a moral stance, you should try it sometimes, after you get out of your AI psychosis.

Yeah, this user has been showing a full-on sect-like behaviour when it comes to “AI” matters, it has been a bit ridiculous.

“Grow up, join the sect. If not you’ll be left out when we all become AI-augmented and fly to Mars”

Wow, that’s an incredibly stupid take. Like, the kind that you generally expect from brainwashed dumbasses that don’t even know what is the difference between a screen and a computer.

That’s scary that people would listen to a guy that completely lost his understanding of reality.

What conclusions? You literally just said that on top of using “AI” to slopcode your software, you could have lied about it, as if that was a defense.

Someone comes to point out the problems of using LLMs, and your answer isn’t about using LLMs or not, but about lying about using them or not.

Why is everyone so nonsensical when it comes to AI?

“I could do worse than I do so don’t criticize anything bad I do”, strong stance

Yeah, that might be true.

The study that picks a handful of guys, and concludes that “many men” are like that, normalizing it and showing men as victims of the modern world.

Trying to understand incel culture to fix the problem is one thing, displaying it as something normal and quasi-universal is another.

Yeah that’s why you communicate. You know, this amazing thing called language? That’s the point of it.

If your communication is so bad that you have no idea whether you’re raping your partner or not, then you should definitely not be having sex. That seems pretty absurdly basic, I don’t even know why I have to explain it.

If you are so worried about being a rapist that it prevents you from enjoying sex, maybe you’re doing things wrong.

This feels like a weird masculinist incel bullshit, and the sample size confirms that it’s just crap.

Are you making slop replies to a comment about your slop-software?

“Please don’t tag this as AI slop, because even though it’s AI slop, I don’t want rules to apply to me”

Ok

The right way to use “AI” is to not use it.

“We once again refused to believe that humans aren’t the center of the universe, and were wrong. We’ll now ignore it and continue believing that we’re the only precious lifeform in the world.”