As is their right, and the right of everyone. Linux is free and open source. The whole beauty of it is that anyone can take it and do what they want with it.

It’s performative. Russia doesn’t produce nearly enough disel to satisfy US needs.

This is so that when Ukraine inevitably blows up more Russian refineries Trump can withdraw whatever support is left for Ukraine.

That’s fair. It would certainly align with the described “spirit” of the policy. Hopefully it becomes clearer in the future.

Very considerate of you to await him at the destination.

Unless you’re doing something extremely common with well-established patterns, search engines have sucked for the past 14 years and been unusable for the past 8. For most of that time I would just refer to official docs, and official code examples, avoiding stackoverflow and other forums since they were just filled with outdated or plain bad info.

Search engines like Kagi might still be decent, but they are few.

I rely on it to scour the docs, the forums, the codebases for any and all potential solutions and neatly present them to me. I then validate and evaluate myself. Just going with the first thing the AI suggests is lunacy and is exactly what I meant by “people are still discovering best practices”.

It’s literally the first sentence of their policy.

Yes, but what about the 2nd sentence?

The following is not allowed in Nura:

• Submitting contributions fully or in part created by generative AI tools to Nura.
• Recommending generative AI tools to other community members for solving problems in the Nura space.

As you can see, it says nothing about researching, troubleshooting, reverse-engineering, etc. As long as you write and understand the code yourself AI is allowed for everything else. As long as you’re not using generative AI it’s fine.

Citation needed.

My personal experience working with AI over the past year. And if that’s not enough, here’s also Linus Torvalds himself.

The arguments regarding resource use and profiting off of theft are valid. The arguments regarding the nature and capabilities of the tech are not. Developers ARE responsible for the code they submit, regardless of how it was created.

Yeah, I personally prefer the bug-free old version:

On a more serious note, we’re still in a period where people are figuring out what AI can/cannot be used for and what the best practices are. Ironically, since it’s better at reverse engineering and bug hunting than developing when compared to a human, it is more useful for hacker and open-source projects than enterprise.

Authors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy and correctness of their work. What tools they use is no concern of mine.

Just dual boot?

Linus Torvalds = Linux

Linus Sebastian ≠ Linux

Good for entertainment. Never take anything they say seriously.

If you actually found a solution I would be very interested. Looking forward to it!

The time at which the phone was wiped the phone did not meet the legal requirements to be considered evidence. Therefore wiping the phone at that time does not constitute as destruction of evidence. You are conflating the legal definition of “evidence” with the layman’s definition of “evidence”.

You NEED to know that before pressing charges. You CANNOT just break into people’s stuff on a whim. What the fuck.

Correct, no evidence was destroyed in this instance.

You have a right to not incriminate yourself. Being investigated for a crime implies probable cause, which this instance lacks unless I’m misreading the article.

“Ah yes, that piece of paper you wrote something on a week ago and threw away that we have no idea what was on it? That is actually now evidence, and since you disposed of it you are now being charged with destruction of evidence.”

The way things are going it might actually become that way. And then you’ll see true insanity.

I’m saying you cant “destroy evidence” if you haven’t been charged with anything since at that point it isn’t considered evidence.

I was investigating this some time ago when I wanted to remote login into my work PC on my local network so that I didnt need a KVM or multiple monitors and peripherals.

Fundamentally this works great in X11 because the core required for this is implemented in X11. Meaning it was easy to create software for this use-case no matter the DE.

Wayland is much more “hollow” in this regard. A lot of features that were core to X11 have been offloaded to the window manager. And by offloaded I mean “we do not handle this stuff, figure it out DE devs!”

This means that for what we want, the DE itself needs to implement it. Gnome does have a remote login feature that might fit the bill. KDE has made 0 attempts at implementing it. Not sure where the rest stand.