it never falls below 35%

For ~1/3 of people there’s no bottom. There’s nothing he can do that won’t still have them supporting him.

Die?

Put it to you this way. I agree with probably most of your views, but the way youre talking to me, I dont want to have anything to do with you either…

Cool, totally sane person.

All youre doing is telling the those ignorant people that your position is judgemental and angry. Amd they’re going to respond with “well I don’t wanna associate with those people”

You can’t shame someone into your moral position. Gay conversion therapy have been trying that for years. It doesnt work. It mostly just build animosity.

Youre doing the right a favor by making the left look so unappealing.

Youre attributing to malicious indifference what is more than likely just ignorance.

Youre mistaking your political involvement to be the standard as though everyone knows and understands the history of Israel/Palestine. Most people barely understand their own countries history. Most people don’t understand economics or markets or politics. Its not their thing.

A lot of people are just not engaged with politics. And you can argue that’s a position of privilege, but its also one of their ignorance. They’re not as interested in it as we are here, that doesnt automatically mean they’re uncaring evil enablers.

You can make the case that they should be more involved. But they’re not hearing evidence and then willfully not acting on it… they’re not hearing anything. And if your position is “those people are the enemy” they’re never going to hear you.

2/3 supporting him is a wild mischaracterization. You can’t just assume everyone who didn’t vote is automatically in support, that’s wild. Like, immature mindset of a child, wild.

Because it’s an easy virtue signal.

tone it down.

You reply this immediately attacking me by assuming I’m reading some “trash” below your standards. Implying that I’m too stupid to recognize it as trash, unlike you…

Everyone thinks “their” news is the real, unbiased source. You are not immune to propaganda.

So… all of them?

That’s intentional. It’s the same reason no one will be reading about Jan6 in history books anytime soon.

funny how he only seems to react this way towards FEMALE reporters.

I mean, he’s a dick to reporters in general, but he only directly insults or tells women to shut up… you’d think that would make people not like him… on account of him being a raging misogynistic rapist and all that… but, no.

ACAB includes Judy Hopps.

What if she’s not a woman? or white? or real? Maybe she’s trans. Not transgender… transdimensional.

Maybe they exist in a space that occupies your mind but not on this physical plane? What if all we see of them is but a piece of the knowable whole and our perceptions give it the shape of what we think it should be? Like an iceberg breaching through dimensional surface, forced into focus by our rules of reality.

How else could they discover that which was unknown?

thought that White House-barred reporters can’t report from anywhere else

Give him time and that’s what he’ll try to do next. I bet you they’re already drafting up executive order to do just that.

I would be shocked if Trump has ever actually watched/listened to anything Hasan has said.

Let’s be honest, this isn’t trump hearing a different view, forming an opinion and disagreeing with it. This is trump being told what the current culture issue is and what his views are.

haHa, she was mean to him on the billionaire propaganda website! He’s done for now! America is saved!

Im putting $100 on it now that he’ll have a SA charge in the next 5 years. And another $100 that it’ll get dropped even with ample evidence.

I don’t regret it, but I loathe than I was forced to. Thrusting Kamala on us after “I’ll only serve one term” Biden decided to run out the clock and fuck everyone over because of his ego really pissed me tf off.

you know what this kind of context absent policing reminds me of? Jaywalking.

Like, a stupid rule made up that sounds reasonable “Keep people safe and not walking into traffic causing accidents”. But that’s not how it was policed… instead regardless of context or traffic, anyone caught walking across the road was punished. Not because it was unsafe to do so… but because… they could. You walked on the nono place, time to punish you.

That’s kind of what you’re doing. You’re removing the intention behind something, removing the context, so that all that’s left is “having a cause to punish people”. Then you get to feel like the big hero who saved traffic… and no one can say you weren’t justified, I mean clearly they were on the road (used the word)… so they had to be punished.

edit. Also, “personal attacks”? Talk about a trumped up reason out of thin air. okaybuddy. You don’t have cause, but you disagree, so you’re making threats. Coolcoolcool.

My dude, you’re the one who gets off putting people down. Not projection. Observation. You’re not policing some arbitrary (and redundant) word because it might offend a specific person. You’re policing it because it gives you a reason to exercise power.

Especially when you treat every usage as equal without examining the context. If you cared about protecting mentally challenged people, you’d be offended when its targeted at them or when any word is used… but you don’t… you only care about one word, regardless of context… and it’s because when that word is used, it’s punishing time… and what a trip it feels to be “morally superior”, now you get to put someone down. You get to ride around on highhorse skeeting your platitudes all over.