Oh, I wasn’t clear.
Pointing out irony. The sidebar shows the rules for the community and that article. Today I’m using FF as my client. Usually Jerboa.
The image is a direct refutation of the usage of “IF” in this context. It was a funny juxtaposition.
If… and this is in the sidebar:
And right after talking to Putin for hours.
Shocked pikachu
No notes.
How are all their articles just so so bad?
OP needs to add this to the body of the post, unless they’re Russian.
This fucker is speed running civil war.
The Democratic party has put us in this position and for that, they have my deepest disappointment.
"We want the [flock safety] to be traumatically affected…When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work because they are increasingly viewed as the villains. We want their funding to be shut down so that the [the surveillance state] can’t do all of the [Fourth Amendment Violations] against our [population] because they have no bandwidth financially to do so.
“We want to put them in trauma.”
Russell Vaught, paraphrased.
I agree with all this except “in case…”.
Our allies know that authoritarians that get voted in, most of the time don’t get voted out. I’m confident they’re worried about when, not if.
I’m convinced that those in power put trump in the whitehouse so that they could basically pull a private equity buy-and-bankrupt on the entire country
It becomes less strange when you constantly ask “who benefits financially” because that is the prime mover here. Beyond that, there is little to consider given current evidence increasingly points to lack of meaningful representation regardless of vote.
Thanks.
For many people, yes, I think it will lead to the end of anonymous accounts, but for many others, it will lead to innovation in bypassing age verification.
Wonder if I could get that for my dog.
Found out yesterday she has bone cancer.
“Socialism for me, but not for thee”
Can I get a bailout if I manage my money idiotically and go bankrupt?
It seems to me that they have a deep misunderstanding of history, and that this door swings both ways, and they’re pushing it hard the other way, and it’s gonna swing back just as hard, or harder.
And maybe that’s what they want, maybe they want some kind of revolution or some collapse of society, but if that’s not what they want, then what are they doing?
I get that generally the regime isn’t that bright, but why are conservatives of power and intelligence not pushing back? This seems rather predictable.
I’m not sure about that. This presidency is more than 50 years in the making, involved a stolen vote, multiple billionaire co-conspirators, even Obama was like “how do we stop this??” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnhBrVb_aaw
They have all the authors of p25 behind them, the house, the senate, the judiciary, the POTUS, the whole shootin’ match.
The coming decades, probably. This won’t be right in my lifetime.
Right???