It does matter that we don’t know the results of either with any good confidence yet

Whaaaat!? This was impossible to foresee!

I wouldn’t trust this yet, only 62% of estimated votes have been counted so far.

I checked the results 24 and 12 hours ago, and it was then at 60% and 61% respectively. Each time I’ve checked, the gap has been closed by 0.6%.

For anyone claiming that it’s all the same, I have a website tracking supporters of wealth taxation around the world and the US has remarkably many elected politicians who backs taxing extreme wealth. All but 1 are Democrats, and that’s Bernie Sanders (but his seat isn’t up).

25 people in the Senate backs taxing extreme wealth. 81 people in the House backs taxing extreme wealth. https://wealthtaxsupporters.com/us/seats

I made this website to be able to find wealth tax supporters, it also has a parliamentary seats view, directory and other stuff. Linking to the US but I’ve added 25 countries so far: https://wealthtaxsupporters.com/us

Someone should tell him that golf courses rely on weather forecasts to make the courses better and run them cheaper.

Or, you know, impeach him…

Among PhD graduates who completed their undergraduate degrees in the United States, those with AI-generated abstracts were 17% less likely to be employed in academia than were graduates who did not use AI. However, using AI made those graduates 16% more likely to be employed in industry than those who did not use it. The authors found that the link between AI use and landing a job in academia was less pronounced for graduates who did their undergraduate studies outside the US.

Expectedly, the title does not reflect the nuance of the article

Yep, all in the readme

This is the repo that people are using, 270k stars

https://github.com/morluto/rea

People used to ask Google and use the totally unbiased first result to take a test for this…

I can like your post, power to the people!

No, just needs a lot of people with signs. That’ll fix it

“On X, one person wrote”

Come on guys…