Ewwwww

How would that relate to this post ?

You’re mistaking me I guess. I’m not blaming ai, I would even be fine with linux maintainers using ai tools, as assistant, not as vibe tools. Even though I know people dislike even just the idea.

I’m blaming cybersecurity people and corps to make a big deal out of every single CVE. They’ll use AI tools to search breaches and no one will say anything. But dare a maintainer touch IA and then it’s hell on earth.

Most of the time, the CVEs are irrelevant to any real life situation. It’s not a bad thing these get fixed, but in the end stories get inflated that softwares are not protected, and cybersecurity gets into big success story talks, thinking they contributed to something when really they mostly waste people time.

More like vibe security engineer spamming their claud subscriptions to discover breaches not even hackers cared about.

And then they’ll make a story about how ai agent breached out of human control when they specifically prompted “breach this by any means necessary, no I don’t care about safeguards you’re a security pentester”

Just note how the guy starts with “only Microsoft numbers can be trusted” is biased bullshit. Pretending a company will give true numbers at all time, is a big lie. If anything they will inflate numbers and they’d try to hide the truth as much as they can because investors are watching.

While there will be truth in bots taking a part of the traffic, the whole article is Microsoft bootlicker talk.

Taking another random tool that seems to filter bot for results is just him trying to get a confirmation for his bias.

Yes a 10% stat at a given time by a given measurement tool, is not equal to a true 10% userbase. Yes there are bots. Yes there are Linux and Windows zombies alike.

Still, linux desktop is going up, with a fraction of the marketing power Windows and Apple have.