Dude, YouTube that quote, it’s super funny.

And a famous chef once said, if my grandmother had wheels she would have been a bike… There has been no evidence in our lifetime that the US has what it takes to do that.

I don’t think you’ll shift anything. The ratchet has been ratcheted. The amount of judges and overall reform needed is just too much and requires spines that don’t exist.

But they should have extreme policies. Without them the ratchet effect and legalization of cartel style governing will be permanent. So it should be trivial to point to, just like it’s trivial to point to current regime extreme policy.

It’s not that they cannot be held by a court to be illegal, it’s that it’s not explicit and can be argued away by a good team. This means the expense to try such a case grows and puts pressure on them not to. Trying it and failing also weakens the current law when applied to normies, which they cannot have either. In this case I’m sure the combination of politics and these loopholes mean it wouldn’t be tried.

I know it’s ridiculous, but you first need to define lawyer and attorney as representing ability to legally practice law. Then you can make falsely claiming this to be illegal. Without defining terms meant to define “represent practicing law,” there’s nothing to make illegal.

Dumb. First description is just readily apparent concise data, then you get a history and more nuanced detail. It’s all relevant, but there’s only so much detail you can present or gather at first glance or to present for hand off before a history is done to find out their zip code and penchant for eating paint chips.

In such a case, shouldn’t they have voted 1 social 2 dem? Approval voting is fine, it allows cross aisle winners which are impossible now, but definitely has the chance of being a weak middle that’s always walking on eggshells.

I personally wish we used issue voting: each candidate takes a test, then you take a test, and an algorithm matches your answers with the candidate to avoid a huge number of problems with media driven campaigns.

Few people want B over their extreme I think. They want their lesser desired B vote to run off to A. Approval disproportionately advantages the middle, least desired by all parties.

deleted by creator

Eh, it works during the period it’s intended to work. When competition is high and not optimized. Optimization results in a need to convert to non-profit public utility status, which is where we fail.

Vote for the next president who has a platform to undo everything and to spend 4 years rounding up everyone doing heinous shit now. That’s the best you’re going to get.

They’d put him on heart lung bypass before giving up his seat. Even if he was dead prior.

Not retaliating is how we got here. Either the next wave causes a red holocaust or you’ll be ratcheted back the other way again.