Stop trying to make Super Intelligence happen.

Is it genocide though?

Yes

UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory concludes Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip

I mean you have to have a better reason to ban AI from open source projects than just bad code.

Limits on submission size and frequency could be placed on Human and AI equally.

Badly written code hurts open source, but humans are just as guilty of that as machines.

This hurts the open source community imho.

Nah. At worst the open source community is indifferent. If someone can pick up where this left off then it benefits the community.

So there are going to be a lot of unregistered Republican voters casting ballots?

OK, as shorthand.

It’s too stale, male and pale for all cases.

Disagree. Only some corporate corruption is.

The whole school of corruption needs highlighting. E.g. 2bn of crypto corruption has nothing to do with Epstein, but shouldn’t be overlooked.

I’m not excluding these people, but by relating this to Epstein specifically you are excluding all the corporate corruption that is unrelated to abusing children.

5 dicks. How do your condoms fit?

…

Like a glove

by the Epstein class.

By corporations. Sure some of them are run by Epsteins clients, but the underlying problem is broader and structural, not moral.

People are not all created equally. Anyone who claims this clearly hasn’t given it any thought.

Is the one thing Oil or China?

That list covered both parties, but most times only one side got posted.

This may just mean Republicans are more careless.

Collective nouns be super random.

My guess is that each piece of generating equipment can be called into action like a ship at sea.

Don’t forget the disposal of the nuclear waste.

Are you implying that Fauci ordered the Wuhan lab to take unnecessary risks? Where is the evidence?

Gain of function research is an unnecessary risk that, by design, creates more dangerous versions of existing viruses. Darpa refused to fund the research.. Instead it was outsourced to Wuhan, funded by the US and approved by Fauci.

Events have proven Biden to be correct in this assessment.

Because it seems there is actual fire under the smoke.

You are also in no position to claim Fauci is a criminal.

I’m not calling him a criminal at all. I’m saying he may have done incriminating things, which have now been pardoned.

your “logic” says that because you can’t proved you haven’t done anything incriminating, I should assume that you are a criminal.

Not quite. You cannot assume I am not a criminal. We cannot assume Fauci did nothing incriminating.

When are you going to provide me evidence that you aren’t a criminal?

I don’t need to. Whether I am or not has no relevance.

Or will you admit that you only emotionally feel Fauci did something criminal

Fauci has means, motivation, opportunity, conspiracy accused colleagues and a blanket pardon. If the US did fund research that lead to covid, he is right at the top of responsibility with the most to gain from an unlawful cover-up and the protection needed to survive any attack. These are facts, not feelings.

If Fauci has to prove he’s not a criminal, then so do you.

He doesn’t. What you have to do is admit the possibility that he may have done something incriminating.

If you order a product to be delivered to your house and the driver of the delivery truck runs over a kid, then it can be proven that you approved funding an activity that resulted in the death of a child. So what should happen next?

Well. If you ordered the driver to go as fast as possible, take the fastest route by the schools and run every red light, then needlessly excessive risks were taken and the ability for you and your successors to make similar orders should be severely curtailed. If you then tried to hide evidence that any enquiry would be interested in, then that would be illegal and should be lawfully punished.

You’re arguing from emotion and there’s no logic to anything.

Quite the opposite. I’m saying it is logically impossible to claim the negative that Fauci had not done anything incriminating. In fact, given that a blanket pardon was granted, it is highly likely that something undisclosed occurred.

it doesn’t matter if Fauci personally approved the funding

Legally irrelevant but reputationally devastating. More than enough reason for illegal cover ups.

Other than the concept of innocent until proven guilty.

The blanket pardon nullifies this argument. Fauci may have done any number of incriminating acts prior to 2024, but none will ever be proven in court. It is not possible to claim there weren’t any.

I can’t prove that you’ve never done anything incriminating.

Now you’ve got it. This statement can’t logically be made.

is it fair for me to assume you’re a criminal?

You are not in a position to claim I am not a criminal.