

1·
13 days agodeleted by creator


deleted by creator


I think the point is that it actually hurts an ethics-based anti-AI argument to also claim that it has no utility, because the no-utility argument is weak and therefore makes the rest of the stance (i.e., the ethics-based argument) look weak by association.
lol these comments. What is the judge supposed to say? “Uh, well, I realize you’ll probably just ignore my order, so just go ahead and do whatever.”