

- Installs regimes friendly to him in countries all over the world.




That’s true.
But does that make things any better? Is exploitation shared among the neo-feudalists better than just half of it? Or should we work to strip these people of their power?
It is precisely this mindset of “others should have it just as bad, or even worse” that brought these people to power, and through this division, they will rule over all of us… if we let them.


Trump being dead wouldn’t solve anything. He’s demented puppet of a rotten system which won’t change just because a the puppet breaks.


Yes and no. I think the reasoning behind this often has to do with how the projectile behaves after striking the target. Generally speaking, a distinction is made between deformation-type and fragmentation-type projectiles, and, if I understand the arguments correctly, it’s assumed that lead-free projectiles don’t fragment as effectively or, in the case of deformation-type projectiles, don’t mushroom as well as lead-based ones do. I don’t know if there was any truth to that when lead-free ammunition was first developed, but today that’s definitely no longer the case, and that argument is therefore invalid.


I’m using lead free ammo since last year and I’m content with the results. Many conservative, mostly older hunters claim that the killing power is inferior. But in my experience, even with a lead-free deformable bullet, the killing power is still perfectly adequate, even for smaller game. Killing power depends largely on the point of impact, so if the animal runs a long way, it’s the hunter’s fault, not the ammunition’s.


I don’t know if it’ll be harder. Critics tend to get tired over time… Salami tactics work after all.


,Across party lines"
,66% of Republicans were opposed"
!?!


Remeber the stolen taxpayer data?
Doesn’t take much data science to figure out whom to display what news via his/her algorythm 2 days before the elections to make them ,make the right choice".


And then they send in the dogeboys to fire and intimidate everyone and probably steal data for who knows what.
Winning the midterms and the next elections is in that data. Starting from personalized ads to blackmailing there’s nothing I think they’re not capable of as they’re rats in a corner.


There are effective vaccines against smallpox.
I think that if a belligerent were to use the disease as a biological weapon, it would first secretly stockpile large quantities of vaccine. Once the disease breaks out, there would be a window of opportunity lasting a few weeks to a few months during which one could gain an advantage, because the enemy would first have to ramp up vaccine production and vaccination rates. When I think about it, however, I have serious doubts as to whether such preparations in the 21st century could be kept secret enough to actually surprise the enemy (in this case, the West).


Possible b weapons against Ukraine?


It does produce nuclear waste…
Just beacause the fuel isn’t radioactive doesn’t mean the whole reactor becomes nuclear waste since it’s constantly bombarded with radiation.
I don’t know why this marketing lie is always presented as fact.


What else did anyone expect (okay, obviously half of Brasil isn’t suspecting or is supporting this)? These right wing puppets in all south american stated don’t install themselves on their own after all…


Either way, the actual goal of censoring news from the White House is achieved… and in the case of this solidarity, the effect is even greater. Or am I misunderstanding something here?
/edit: Okay I actually misunderstood something: Its not about media coverage in total but about giving Trump a platform. This makes much more sense.


My guess as uninformed person is more like a strategic meeting on the topic on ,who how and where can (we) rig this election?"


Citizens should face the fact that Reps are going to steal the election, no matter how hard every US citizen tries to vote, and think about what he/she is willing to do.


And it will suffice.
The whole system is based on rules not being applied in time (for example you can’t undemolish a west wing, even if the court rules it was illegal afterwards). They create facts and thats the win they need no matter what some judge says afterwards.
In this case they can mess with the voters and influence the maybe most important election of this century.


As long as we allow propaganda to be directly funneled into the brains of a majority of the population via social media we shouldn’t be surprised rejecting reality is easy.
I understand the argument, but I’m not sure if this circus of wacky sock puppets isn’t primarily meant to distract us from the things that really matter right now, because we get so worked up every day over the nonsense coming out of the current administration.