GalacticSushi

What are they going to do? Charge him with something he already has a pardon for? Besides, the last Democrat controlled Congress has shown multiple times that if you ignore a subpoena they won’t actually do shit about it.

The next candidate who floats a blanket pardon for anyone convicted of murdering any billionaire gets my vote.

Maybe, but if you have a blanket pardon then what are they going to charge you if you just refuse to comply? You’ve already been pardoned for the hypothetical contempt.

It’s weird how conservatives who pretend to not like [insert literally anything conservatives complain about] engage in nothing but that.

I will also point out that anti-abortion protestors often carry signs that say things like “what if Jesus had been aborted?” He wasn’t, obviously, so that’s just a weird hypothetical.

But he was arrested, put on trial by the government, sentenced to death, and lawfully executed via crucifixion by the Roman government. His death was completely above board from a legal and political perspective. So you’d think Christians in general would be more firmly against the notion of lawfully executing criminals.

some hardcore eye-for-an-eye shit you can take the kids to

Brought to you by the same pearl clutchers that think drag queens reading a story to kids is totally inappropriate.

People were losing their jobs for repeating things Charlie Kirk said word for word. But there was no pearl clutching when he said that “some patriot” should bail out the man who attacked Paul Pelosi with a hammer. Not uproar over trump saying he was glad that Robert Mueller had died. They know that they’re hypocrites, but they’ve realized that decency and the social contract in general can be wielded as a cudgel if your side collectively agrees to give themselves a pass.

Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

• Jean-Paul Sartre

They have no intention of meaningfully opposing trump. Just empty campaign rhetoric. If they secure a seat, they’ll suddenly stop talking about the war altogether.

That’s what Ohio did. Their maps were ruled unconstitutional, then they just did absolutely nothing to fix them and when the midterms came around they said “well we can’t just have an election with no maps at all, we’ll just go ahead and use these unconstitutional ones for the time being.”

I’ve spoken to multiple conservatives who believe this man is “saving America from socialism.”

It means grandpa is due for another infusion of anti-dementia drugs. Expect him to disappear from public for a few days and return with yet another bruised hand.

Trump: “If you stop the testing, the cases will go down. Drink bleach! UV buttplugs!”

USA: “Let’s try another dangerously old guy for a bit, but if eggs are too expensive after a few years we’ll give this guy another shot.”

It’s a blatant 1st amendment violation regardless

Par for the course, honestly.

He and his buddies are doing just fine. Maybe you should try being in the loop on the insider trading, mass market manipulation, and pump and dump schemes?

And immediately following he’ll announce his candidacy to thunderous applause from the cult

soldiers in caskets

Don’t you mean losers and suckers in caskets?

Same reason they constantly describe Epstein victims with the oxymoronic term “underage women.”

He’s probably “technically” alive thanks to an IV infusion of pure malice and a bunch of machines they’ll unplug on August 4.

even closer to an election!

Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed on October 25, 2020. Early voting was already open in a number of States and ballots had already been cast. So technically her confirmation hearing happened during an ongoing election, not just closer to one.