Seriously wondering why I see as many as I do, considering the big backlash it gets, and the fact that most people just write it off as slop and go on about their way. I opened the post, thought it looked like AI, checked comments for if others thought it was too, then immediately disregarded whatever the post contained.

GrapheneOS and Motorola are currently working on making their next flagships launch with GOS out of the box.

That is what he used, but it is possible to go from Reticulum to Reticulum device without the need for those services, he just happened to use them in the video example. In this hypothetical future, those services won’t be completely cut out anytime soon, but it is possible to rely on them much lesser.

Thanks for the dive into that. We seem to all mutually accept that stories may not be told with complete factuality or nonbias in the modern day, whereby metrics such as website traffic is how revenue is often generated. Furthermore, if a political bias is present in a source, we all seem to understand that it may undermine the factuality. I say this to put forth that while we may agree with sentiments of pro-privacy topics, our sources are not inherently better than sources opposed to our beliefs, and that misinformation can appear anywhere, and not entirely due to malicious intent.

Thanks for being the fact-checker here.

It takes a bit of personal analysis into the product’s direction to see this stuff coming. Cape was founded and rapidly advertised in sponsorships, YT ads, loads of influencers, etc. Say it with me now, that sounds like investor capital! Truth be told, y’all should probs check for those signs when seeing adverts or sponsorships, it can tell a lot about the behind-the-scenes connections of the company.

This is in comparison to, while not perfect (nor exactly the same product), Phreeli, which doesn’t appear to have this massive investor capital money behind it, thus a lesser budget for advertising.