Hmmm I’d say it’s more like they got killed and taken over by a parasite, but then because the parasite had an actual business model and engineers for a decade people just said “oh well actually this is an improvement” then that parasite got absorbed by a bigger, more evil parasite and things started going to shit.
A study isn’t valid simply because it’s a study, and headlines telling you what to think of their results without at least a vague sense of the numbers are propagandistic by nature.
Rated better quality? By who and how much? Pretty basic details to include.
From what the guardian reports on the details, this study looks like garbage. From the posted stories, the results are definitely garbage, and whether that’s the fault of the researcher or humanity will need a closer inspection.
I’ll tell you right now, coming to such a broad conclusion because some American sophomore students liked three AI stories better than three selected human written stories sounds pretty fucking stupid.
Especially not when all it did was flood the Internet with slop, making the offer searches useless
You can argue it, but you’d be wrong.
It’s crazy, like overpopulation, stress, and pollution mean people don’t want kids or something.
I’d believe this if every generation didn’t say the exact same thing, if the very premise that there’s an upward trend is flawed, and they didn’t have a picture of a Gen Alpha at the latest in the headline.
“Why do Americans care if Ford supports Hitler, he’s not even German!”
Interesting combination of lies and unironic use of “cancel culture” in the rest of the nonsense btw.
?
Bye Felicia. Good luck finding smart people on NeoTwitter lmao.
You guys are so negative. Critical support for our Twitter comrades is necessary in their quest to annoy the absolute shit out of Musk.