deleted by creator

Holy invalidating methodological weaknesses that journal has a low credibility score.

Also, the paper is incomprehensibly written, but after digging through the sources, the dataset is 35 self selected (through internet peer recruitment) college aged men (of which 31 were heteosexual).

As the study is qualitative, it’s no use criticising the findings too badly. It shouldn’t be hard to find 31 chronically online men on a forum/discord/comm somewhere who share these ideas.

It would be interesting to compare this to a more average population though.

Cthulhu fhthagn?

deleted by creator

No-one said the revolution would be easy, immediate, nor convenient.

You get the treatment you tolerate.

Prepare accordingly.

The point is to show up in large enough numbers that it doesn’t matter.

Revolts aren’t without risk, and typically bloody.