Yes this is absolutely a risk…

Do they use them as pagers and barcode scanners or something?

He nuked aliens invading Manhattan, using words like always/never is reductive.

“archived” probably put a pause on the interest, which is the whole point of savings accounts

All the good ones left or were pushed out 🤷🏻‍♂️

They are conspiring, all of them are 100% responsible. The way you are phrasing it makes it seem like trump is just a puppet, which is not the case. I would also attribute some of the ease to do damage to the exodus of career bureaucrats. Normal people have stepped out of roles that are now filled with sycophants, idiots and criminals.

That is an insane take

Hitler never ordered the Holocaust directly or personally.

But he fomented, and implicitly and explicitly assented to the entire process. He delegated the authority to others to engage in the Holocaust freely. He could have removed that authority at any time and did not.

Yeah I was thinking it would shrink the clickable area.

I haven’t used dolphin in forever though, I’m probably past being helpful

The view mode, but never mind you found the option for this behaviour

Detail view is probably different from list view, you should check

Nah I’m just accepting the intellectual dishonesty, bored of it

K

I can’t sit here and pick apart literally every subject, I have the material but not the time, I have to work in the morning

Cool, so we agree that vaccine hesitancy is figuratively cherry picking, if people are paranoid and distrustful across the board 🤌🏻

your grocer,

They can poison your food, or sell substandard/filler/replacement goods, and you do not check

landlord,

They have keys to your house that you trust them to not use, and you might have an alarm system that makes this a moot point and you actually don’t trust them

water supply,

You don’t test your water, you trust that it’s within acceptable limits.

There is a level of trust that you do display. Is it because you don’t think about these things, and you actually would do those tests if you knew what and how to test for? You only I both know, you wouldn’t. You know that there are consequences for the grocery clerk, landlord, municipal worker for abusing their position, profession, etc.

I want you to tell me how the Pharma academics and industry are afforded any different level of trust to the engineering, agricultural, residential etc design and supply chains, the crux of my argument is that there is not a real difference.

So, at some point where he’s proved his methods of work, he’s going to be trusted.

The same is for basically any medical researcher. Why are individuals expected to make an informed assessment, when by any account the structure that has that researcher gain their position has them suffer the scrutiny of people that have a much better idea of what problems might be in that research, and a vested interest in picking apart that methodology? (Writing their own paper for school or getting published themselves)

I literally can’t do better than take the information I have access to and understand (my mechanic has spent time educating me, being transparent, and given me cost/benefit opinion; the medical researchers have gained degrees from credible orgs, peer review has not discredited the methodology, research is replicable etc)

I’m not going to go to trade school or medical school. Trusting them is happening, or I go live in a cabin in the woods. You trust people implicitly, your grocer, landlord, water supply, etc. There are thousands of ways that the people you rely on every day could maim or outright kill you. That doesn’t happen. Applying this level of mistrust to a shot you get every 6 months and not the things you imbibe and tolerate every day is not logically consistent.

No my point is, I’m trusting him when I’m not watching too.

We can extrapolate from the existing body of work of these scientists, we demonstrably can trust them bro.

That experiment that started 90 years ago, running for 40 years, never underwent any contemporary peer review. The COVID vaccines have, with government reviews, dozens of outside parties having a look into the formulations, many papers speaking to the theoretical and I’m sure by now practical efficacy.

You can’t compare a region limited pre electric conspiracy to a contemporary information age alleged conspiracy, the circumstances and scale reduce any parallels to background noise.

I trust my mechanic, because when he replaced a rusty section of my exhaust he used a stethoscope to check if his welds were airtight, I watched him do it.

I trust the scientists, because people watching them do the work is exactly what peer review and replication are.

The rest of the stuff they do, that I don’t understand, I will trust implicitly because of how open and honest the things I do understand were.

No way, you mean many governments prioritized research and production of the same thing, simultaneously? As if, it’s not like people were dying or something /s

Yeah I think it’s weird too, inconsiderate of the person, I wouldn’t take or post photos like that either.

Still, the pictures probably depict normal day to day care of the kid, if there were specific acts portrayed those would be described in the article. They aren’t. The whole article uncritically quotes both sides, who are both doing their best to be in the top position of power.

It’s a shit article that doesn’t even acknowledge the real problem, the parents weaponizing everything at hand at the expense of their child.

This is just two typical conservatives going nuclear despite collateral damage. The photo as described is probably bath time or another normal toddler photo.

Of course his ex wife is accusing him of everything under the sun, some of those things he probably did do. And of course he’s publishing family photos. Obviously his daughter doesn’t get a choice of how public her life is, children are property after all /s