I believe the article was posted on Friday. Who nose. Just copied and pasted that section of the article.

When President Donald Trump was reminded in an interview with Time magazine this week that he had said he would end the Russian war on Ukraine on “day one,” he claimed he hadn’t been speaking literally or seriously.

“Well, I said that figuratively, and I said that as an exaggeration, because to make a point, and you know, it gets, of course, by the fake news [unintelligible]. Obviously, people know that when I said that, it was said in jest, but it was also said that it will be ended,” Trump said, according to Time’s transcript.

This “in jest” claim is a lie.

On the campaign trail in 2023 and 2024, Trump said on dozens of occasions, in an entirely serious tone, manner and context, that he would end the war in Ukraine either within 24 hours of his return to the White House or even sooner than that. He said over and over again, including at both presidential debates of 2024, that he would have the war “settled” when he was president-elect, before his inauguration.

A Friday search of the Roll Call Factba.se database that catalogues Trump’s public remarks turned up at least 53 examples of Trump making such comments.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/25/politics/fact-check-trump-ukraine-war

Uh oh, looks like you didn’t read far enough:

On Monday, two days after the incident occurred, Mr Crane confirmed that the data had been recovered. The Independent has reached out to Anthropic and Cursor for comment.

So again… Well, do I need to paste it again?

So again, because we make backups before letting AI touch anything:

“Hey slop machine, you fucked up. Restore the last backup and document the mistake you made in AGENTS.md so we avoid making that mistake again. Im going to go make a coffee, brb”

Oops, slop machine broke something.

“Hey slop machine, you fucked up. Restore the last backup and document the mistake you made in AGENTS.md so we avoid making that mistake again. Im going to go make a coffee, brb”

Hardware I’m running:

• 8/16 AMD CPU
• 32GB system RAM
• 12GB GPU VRAM (AMD)

I’m mainly using these MoE models:

Qwen-3.6-35B-A3B

• Q4_K_M quant quality
• 128k context (conversation length before it compacts)
• Gives me about 260 prefill and 19 token gen speeds

Gemma4-26B-A4B

• Q8 quant quality
• 128k context length
• Gives me about 190 prefill and 14 token gen speeds

I created git repos on my main workstation for each homelab server/service I maintain that keeps:

• documentation
• notes
• lessons learned
• scripts, configs
• runbooks
• backup details
• security audit details
• log items that need attention
• infrastructure

I just point a local LLM (offline model that runs on my workststion) into those repos and ask it to perform certain things on those servers. It can do things like update packages, install packages, make config changes, set/check permissions, read logs (and fix errors in real time), and check the health of the overall system.

I have it run pre backups before making changes, then post backups once its done.

Once changes are in place and everything is running okay, I ask it to update documentation in the repo and tag the release.

I use opencode that connects to a llama.cpp service. opencode lets me gate the AI so that any elevated commands that it needs to run (e.g. sudo or ssh), I have to approve it. It cant just go around making changes without permission.

This question is how new apps are born

Let me walk you through this.

Why isnt it auditing the rich?

Why?

Doesn’t appear to be functioning properly at all

Looks like they are about 40 trillion behind. Do the lower 75% income earners in America even make enough in their lifetime to put a dent in it? No? Then fuck the IRS

The Christians are going to love this one

Didn’t he just vote by mail in the primary election?

Just to be clear, normally, I love when people come to this country to enjoy the freedoms that Americans deserve, that all people deserve. But dont come right now, because you will not get yo enjoy those freedoms under this administration. Do so at your own risk. There are “not very nice people” running our government, currently.

Those devices should most certainly be on two separate networks. Internet facing devices should be on a DMZ and not be allowed to talk to your internal network. You can then allow your internal network reach your DMZ devices, but only allow return traffic from the DMZ.

One thing you could deploy throughout all your internal networks are honeypots that send alerts upon ANY network activity. Nobody should be hitting those at all.