Actually, what I have seen all over the places is people reviewing my manuscripts by passing them to chatgpt and sending revision requests without even reading the article.
It happened to me being asked to do a major review because I was not describing enough in detail how I trained LLM models in my research; my research was not about LLMs and never mentioned LLMs anywhere.
That’s what we’re seeing all over the place - you get more work done, but then other people have to fix or error-check your work, slowing them down.
So all the individual workers get more work done, but the organisation doesn’t get more work done.
Actually, what I have seen all over the places is people reviewing my manuscripts by passing them to chatgpt and sending revision requests without even reading the article.
It happened to me being asked to do a major review because I was not describing enough in detail how I trained LLM models in my research; my research was not about LLMs and never mentioned LLMs anywhere.