New York Times: Sources: the US DOJ is probing whether ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, and Fox News violated antitrust law by briefly suspending their White House pool coverage of Trump  —  Major TV networks were notified on Friday that the department was looking into whether they violated antitrust laws when they suspended pool coverage of President Trump.

  • Pratai@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    History has never known such a colossal little bitch like trump.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    6 days ago

    Trump: “It’s my house, I can invite who I want to invite.”

    Also Trump: “If I invite you to my house, it’s illegal for you to not show up!”

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Also, the party that is concerned about transparency, free speech, and so very butthurt about “cancel culture”.

      Cheering as things are weaponized against the media, and literally canceling shows like Colbert’s.

  • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    6 days ago

    Be there to cover the president’s peach? Straight to jail.

    Not being there? Believe it or not, also jail.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 days ago

    You mean like they “probed” the kayaker that supposedly cut a gash in the reflecting pool and they had evidence “beyond reasonable doubt” that apparently had so much doubt that they completely dropped the case? Seriously, who believes this shit anymore? Why does anyone think this is okay?

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Exactly, I imagine this “probe” is “making wild declarations that the fantasies of a demented old windbag are factual”.

              • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                Putting aside calling me impotent… :P

                They are. They are frustrated. In their worldview, fed to them by the fascists, everything is also wrong. It’s just that they are told that fascism will fix things. I know a lot of them put blind faith in that, but a lot of them also get tired of the repeated lies. The problem is that they are led to believe that both sides lie equally, so they might as well go with the side that panders to their hate and reassures them that they are right and better than everyone else.

                I do have some sympathy for them on one level. And frankly, the problem we should face is the oligarchs and Citizens United. If we were able to solve our oligarch problem, we would have to figure out how to properly educate MAGA, becasue frankly, MAGA is also a wedge issue the oligarchs use to divide us.

                So while MAGA wants to kill people like me, I view them as victims of propaganda, although they do choose to live in that world as well.

                • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Impotent as in helpless against our oppressors, I’m sure you’re really good at sex :p

                  This really is one of the calmer, better reasoned takes I’ve encountered online recently, thanks for sharing it. There’s something I’d like to expand on more than debate though. Really more about my own fixation on that propaganda than anything. Even the oligarchy and obvious corruption are themselves symptoms of the worship of wealth that drives our civilization. Even if every decision maker were replaced with a benevolent humanist the systems we’ve built exist to make number go up, not quality of life. Our morality, our cultural values, our very perception is constructed around the idea of more being better and the inevitability of the process of coercive extraction through which we’re all meant to compete in consolidating our hoards at one another’s expense. We’re strung out and impotent (yes, all of us) and addicted to intensity of experience itself. Red team/blue team were arbitrary divisions to capture tribal identity long before MAGA or even KKK coalesced as focal points, and I don’t think it’s wise to approach them as a root cause or core issue. The “MAGA” that wants you dead is a freakish abberation amplified and presented to you because of the utility that has to the status quo. It’s an essentially nonexistent bogeyman, a narrative counterpoint to the transwoman scheming to make your kids gay. A division, an escalation, a distraction. KKK was likewise not an organic groundswell of hatred but carefully orchestrated political theater. I highly recommend looking into their history, these things are often much clearer from a distance. We are all victims of propaganda, like Garfield tshirt says “you are not immune”. Even the miserable billionaires with every material luxury and still no contentment. Especially them, in a sense. They’re certainly the least connected to humanity and most thoroughly processed of us. I spend a lot of time on the street and can promise 1/3 of the country does not want you dead. The vast majority of us all want the same thing, and it’s lot more like a hug and a sandwich despite all efforts to the contrary.

                  I kinda lost whatever point I may have been trying to make, but thanks for the opportunity to ramble. Going to cut it off here before I start going on about AI as a way for capital to replicate human output convincingly enough to directly manufacture consent, and the consequences of atomization and the escalation between engaging in more and more granular subcultures on heavily monitored platforms and just each engaging with the machine directly, and 9/11 being used to establish a near-omniscient surveillance apparatus and covid being used to force its adoption, and how… I need to touch grass.

    • kurmudgeon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 days ago

      Trump can’t let shit go. He’s trying to bring back his fight against Hillary Clinton. Even though courts have shut it down repeatedly. Hell, the mother fucker thinks he should get a Nobel Peace prize even though he started a war, disrupted the world economy, kidnapped another country’s leader and dragged him to the United States.

      He’s a fucking narcissistic idiot.

  • neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    Where “Probing” is asking their legal LLMs to find case law that supports their horseshit crybaby tantrums against press freedoms.

  • CyberneticOwl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Paramount-Warner Merger: No problem, Larry, have fun

    Press protests censorship: WTF?! That’s not how this works!

  • TransNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    freedom of speech also means freedom to shut up and not talk about nazis.

    all those in PA remember one thing. If you vote for Frank Pastella and the rest of the republicans, you vote to let Pastella rape your kids. Vote no to Republikkkans like Frank Pastella to keep their dicks outside of your children’s bodies.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      An investigation would mean actually trying to learn about what happened and whether it violated any laws.

      Probing means they poke it with a stick. They already know there’s nothing illegal about it, but they have to make their supporters think they’re doing something.

      Really though, both words have the same meaning in this type of context. They’re used interchangeably quite a bit.

      • myyass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        “They already know there’s nothing illegal about it, but they have to make their supporters think they’re doing something.”

        Thanks for clarifying that so well. That’s something that flew over my head lol

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      My guess is that an investigation is an official act that would have history and a paper trail. A probe can be swept away and hidden if you don’t like the answer. Or it could just be the way the author choose to frame it. Who knows with this administration?