• _chris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    Don’t believe it. Vote irregardless of anything you hear or see saying it’s a sure loss for them.

    It’s 100% part of the fascist propaganda machine.

      • BruisedMoose@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Technically, sadly, irregardless is recognized as an actual word. Sure, with an asterisk, but still.

        The president of my company who always thought he was the sharpest MFer in the room always used it. It was only one of the reasons I disliked him, but it was definitely a reason.

        • Logi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          Technically, no. But in practice yes. Unless you’re going to start in on ruining the word “technically” as well.

            • SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              19 days ago

              how I always took was that it’s like saying regardless and/or irregardless (regardless or not) with only one extra syllable instead of all 3, to be used as a changing-of-topics transition phrase.

              But I remember a few times when some people would use the “longer version” at times when it seemed like they really only needed/meant to be using the word regardless.

              FMP those people just liked saying the slightly longer word slightly more because it made them look/sound smarter.

              I don’t know if I hallucinated that whole definition part into existence though because my sample size for this type of memory of conversations is limited in both total frequency and relative importance in moments when people have ever been using the word regardless, vs irregardlesses, around me

              • Logi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 days ago

                FMP those people just liked saying the slightly longer word slightly more because it made them look/sound smarter.

                Little do they know. Literally and figuratively.

                Still not as bad as using “whom” wrong.

              • BruisedMoose@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 days ago

                regardless or not

                Look, it’s only 7:30 and I’m just finishing my first cup of coffee, but this is hurting my brain. I understand what you’re saying, I’m just trying to make it make sense in any context and can’t do it.