Psychedelics are often associated with disconnecting from reality, but a recent neuroimaging study found that psilocybin can actually make our brain activity more attuned to the world around us.

  • Vegan_Joe@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maybe they are referring to ibogaine as a partial agonist for opioid receptors. “Hits receptors sideways” is an odd and incorrect way of stating that though

      • Vegan_Joe@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        What are you actually referring to though? Was I correct that you are implying that it is a partial agonist?

        “Hits the receptor sideways” may be common pseudoscientific jargon, but it means nothing within the context of neuroscience or neuropharmacology.

        So, to clarify, what exactly do you mean by it?

        • bedwyr@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          2 months ago

          I explained this in another response. I will not explain again because I think you are acting like a [redacted,] and as such suspect you are one of those people with nothing to contribute so you just look for people to put down, and choose half baked reasons to do so.

          Frankly you don’t warrant a respone, you half wit supporters either.

          • Vegan_Joe@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 months ago

            Something may have gotten lost in the mix. You are taking a very defensive stance, when I asked a neutral question.

            I looked through your responses, and at no point did you clarify what you actually meant by the phrase “hits the receptor sideways”.

            I’m pretty sure you are referring to the fact that it is a partial agonist, and all I requested was that you clarify if that was the case.

            I apologize if that somehow put you on your heels.

            That said, there is no need for name calling or projecting ill intent. Thank you very much

            • bedwyr@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              2 months ago

              Common parlance, not speaking scientifically, is not pseudoscience for starters, and that you think it is says a lot about the wisdom of even further responding to you here.

          • crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            You just have no idea what you’re talking about and you’re too lazy to google the actual responses and copy and paste them here. hilarious and pathetic

            • bedwyr@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              2 months ago

              I am not invested in what some rude half wits think about my truthful information. You don’t deserve to know acting like that frankly and I hope you don’t believe it. Now piss off.

              • crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                You probably need some Iboga to get you off your severe copium addiction hahahaha you can’t make this up