Episode 1056 of Democrats Are Worthless.

  • Astronut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is the reason I’m switching from democrat to independent! These fucks are hardly better than republicans.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s silly. Stay registered Democrat and primary those corporate shills right the fuck out. Install progressives and take over the party.

    • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, as far as I’m aware the only reason to be registered one way or the other is to be allowed to participate in closed primaries.

    • BozeKnoflook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Hardly better” ?

      I’ll gladly criticize the DNC and upper Democratic Party leadership all fucking day long, but I say this as a quasi anarchist / socialist-libertarian: they are fucking leagues better than the republicans who are racist and xenophobic to their core, stealing unimaginable amounts of money from everybody they can, are defending a goddamn cabal of child raping pedophiles, and are doing their fucking best to establish a fascist state.

      “oH bUt hE dOeSnT lIkE uNiVeRsaL hEaLtHcArE!!” yea fuck him, but to compare that failure to people actively protecting child rapists? Fuck offfffffffff.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        They’re spoilers for actual socialist candidates. This is a dog and pony show.

        • BozeKnoflook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ll admit I left the US a few years ago, so I may be a little out of the loop but… what fucking “actual socialist” candidates? Are there more than three yet?

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, we had one, last presidential election and Democrats sued and won to keep her off the swing state ballots.

            • BozeKnoflook@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              One. My man, at the federal level there’s 435 members of the House and 100 members of the Senate. At the state level there’s 50 governors and 7,383 total legislative seats.

              I don’t think you can blame Democrats for being spoilers to “actual socialists” when “actual socialists” aren’t on the damn menu.

              According to Wikipedia there’s 102 DSA-aligned (who are Democratic-Socialists and not “actual socialists”) politicians at the federal and state level. Out of 7,968 seats. Barely over 1%.

        • aaa999@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          “if the democratic party collapsed the population of the usa would all vote psl/acp”

          haha

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I stay in the Democratic party simply so I can vote these assholes out with voting for their progressive challengers while donating and volunteering for them.

      • Hayduke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is the way. It’s regrettable, but the only viable path forward short of outright revolution. Voting anything other than dem (or being a total fuckwit and not voting) effectively cements our fall to complete fascism.

        But to your point. Progressives (such as they are here in the states) are the only hope to claw our way out of the hole neo-cons/neo-libs have thrown us into.

        • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Didn’t get me wrong, I’m a hair’s breadth away from not voting for these Republican in Democrats veneer jackasses either.

          A slow slide toward fascism is still sliding toward fascism and these worthless assholes are doing just that. I mean for fucks sake, there’s Katie Hobbs running with a Republican right now.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Jefferies has a leadership position because it was held two weeks before the DNC chair.

      If someone like Jamie Harrison (Feb 2021-Feb 2025 chair named by Biden) became chair, then not voting Jefferies/Schumer would have caused the biased DNC to withhold the stolen funds from the Victory Fund…

      That’s why they’re “leadership”.

      However the voting members of the DNC got to vote because we didn’t have an incoming dem president. So…

      When they picked Martin, and he dumped all that money on state parties with zero strings, Schumer and Jefferies lost all their political power.

      Jefferies and Schumer’s only shot at returning neoliberals to the DNC, is if a progressive Dem doesn’t become president in 2029. That’s why they want you to leave the party, even if a Republican wins after Trump because of it.

      If a progressive becomes president in 2029, they name the DNC chair, and that’s game over for neoliberalism.

      For the love of anything you care about, stop telling people the time to give up is right before we win.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ll admit that I don’t understand the inner workings of the Democratic Party, but I want to say: It’s not that neoliberals control the money because they run/ran the DNC, but that the DNC had money because it was controlled by neoliberals. This money ultimately comes from donors, who give it to neoliberals no matter what post those neoliberals currently hold. To a first approximation, the more progressive the party is, the less money it gets, with the difference going to neoliberals directly. The point being: The neoliberals’ political comes from their rich backers (and the media connections of those rich backers), not from their party posts, so while their power would be diminished by losing control of the party they’d be far from done for.